web analytics
 Editor
5 Comments

Why Does Texas Hate Vaginas?

Why Does Texas Hate Vaginas?
Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size Text Size Print This Page

By:Amanda Hart

It is expensive to be born with a vagina. Tampons alone at times are a commodity (ladies, let me introduce you to your new best friend: The Diva Cup. Your “shit, i guess I’ll just use toilet paper” days are over). And tampons are just one of the many items our vagina’s demand that we sometimes can’t afford. However, i would have to say that above all the other items we need to function in our society the one closer to the top of the list is some form of birth control.

I would like to think that we have progressed past a time in which our doctors and legislators have control over our bodies, but unfortunately this is just wishful thinking. For the last five years Texas has offered The Texas Women’s Health Program (TWHP). This once great program provided free birth control, breast, cervical and STD screenings to women who otherwise could not afford them. This assault on reproductive rights was calculated and carried out through anti abortion groups like, Texas Right to Life and our Planned Parenthood hating politicians.

As if Planned Parenthood and the women who rely on them have not been marginalized enough this past legislation through budget cuts and a bullshit sonogram bill, now they are attempting to use rhetoric to kick us in the clit just one more time. Currently the TWHP is up for renewal and although this program has benefited approximately 300,000 Texas women and families over the last five years (me included, independent journalism isn’t exactly known for its health benefits), republicans are set on adjusting the language so that it will exclude Planned Parenthood from the program. 40% of the women who rely on the program received their services through Planned Parenthood. The TWHP saves an estimated $20 million in annual Medicaid spending and receives $9 in federal money for every $1 it spends on the program.  And sadly, cutting the program would lead to an estimated 20,000 more unplanned pregnancies (which logically means: more money).

To guarantee that Planned Parenthood providers cannot participate in the program, the bill includes a provision that states if the bill becomes a law and Planned Parenthood sues to overturn it, the state program would be discontinued entirely.

It is well known that Planned Parenthood does not use state or federal money to fund abortions. All Planned Parenthood abortion funding comes from private donors. Family planning clinics all over Texas were recently defunded by cutting $74 million of the $111 million administered by the state’s Department of State Health Services. These cuts affect all facilities but Planned Parenthood took the biggest hit and this is why republicans and anti abortion groups went after said funding.

Texas Right to Life’s Legislative Director John Seago recently told pro-life site LifeSiteNews.com,  “Even though these clinics are family planning clinics — so there’s not actually any abortions being provided at the clinics that are closing their doors — there’s no mistake that these are abortion-minded clinics that are sending women to abortion clinics.”

These same morons who are ecstatic about the harm they have done to women’s reproductive rights are equally zealous about an increase in state funds to the state’s Alternative to Abortion Services Program (AASP). The AASP’s budget saw a small but significant spike from $4 million to $4.15 million during our last legislation. The AASP disperses money to faith-based and largely unregulated Crisis Pregnancy Centers (CPC’s).

CPC’s offer ‘mentoring’ and ‘counseling’ to women who are faced with unwanted pregnancies and usually offer no medical services. The centers have a long history of violations, as reported by the Texas Independent, “Official records show… violations ranging from fire safety to possible breaches of client privacy. During 15 percent of inspections (which were not undercover visits), subcontractors had failed to separate and label spiritual and educational materials properly.”

The truth is that even though Planned Parenthood and other family planning facilities are being forced to close their doors and limit services the real victims here are ultimately going to be low income women.

5 Responses to Why Does Texas Hate Vaginas?

  1. Josh Jones May 2, 2012 at 2:04 pm

    Good. Get rid of planned paranthood. Something else we have to pay for that we don’t need. Not everyone needs to pay for your mistakes and birth control. Only you need too.

    Reply
  2. Charity September 24, 2011 at 1:16 pm

    Noa, you probably should have finished reading the article. Welfare recipients don’t need a “federally funded program to help them continue to make poor decisions, like unprotected sex”. Using birth control is definitely not a poor decision, and this has nothing to do with welfare. This is about the thousands of children that will be born to poor parents that once relied on the services of Planned Parenthood. I feel so sorry for these children, but they will learn soon enough that this government just doesn’t care about them, especially when they’re poor.

    Reply
  3. Amanda September 19, 2011 at 11:31 am

    Noa,

    I am happy you almost vomited.

    sincerely,
    The low income “whore” who should just keep my legs closed as opposed to having access to affordable birth control

    P.s. Next time, ill do my best to actually make you vomit.

    Reply
  4. Ellena September 13, 2011 at 4:54 pm

    Wow!!!! There are plenty of uses for PLANNED PARENTHOOD!!! You are either not a woman or a wealthy republican if you think for one minute that the only reason planned parenthood is only here for abortions. Do you really think that animals can refrain completely from sexual activities???? Really??? We are all animals in the end, right? WTF is wrong with people? Do you not know that when a girl turns 18 she should be getting annuals as a cancer preventative? Do you know how many individuals count on going to planned parenthood for these pap’s? There is no way that you can simply tell people not to do what is in there nature. I’m so angered by this ideology that it saddens me to think of how many WOMEN will go with out this preventative healthcare! In the end there will only be more money that taxpayers will have to dish out in welfare because birth control will no longer be available to citizens who can not afford them!!!

    Reply
  5. Noa Ramsey September 10, 2011 at 3:07 pm

    I couldn’t finish this article without wanting to vomit!!! Basically there are people who think the whole nation should fund their irresponsible habits!!!??? It’s not like ‘unplanned parenthood’ just happens… and oops not I am a welfare recipient. There are numerous preventative measures that cost absolutely nothing but time and a little thing called parenting. Or simply…. Close Your Legs!! I think its revolting that as a country we have become enablers. Don’t get me wrong, there are genuine cases in which people need help to get on their feet. Needing a federally funded program to help you continue to make poor decsions like unprotected sex when you are clearly unable to financially accept the consequences of those decisions is absurd and a gross misuse of my tax dollars. Frankly, the statement of the costs being much higher if we don’t provide these programs shows the class of people we are speaking about. Our country is economically drowning because to many of these Amanda Hart minded people are draining it’s resources without giving back!!! Just another case of irresponsible American “culture”. We see it in everything: family income to debt ratio, forclosure rate, oil spills, energy crisis, and it is especially reflected in this article. I for one voted for change and that’s what I want to see!!! We as individuals need to become more responsible for our own actions and make better decisions!!!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>