web analytics
 Editor
3 Comments

Interview: Houston Tomorrow’s Jay Crossley on Transit Taxes

Interview: Houston Tomorrow’s Jay Crossley on Transit Taxes
Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size Text Size Print This Page

By: Erin Dyer

Illustration by Tim Dorsey

Pro-transit activist, environmentalist, sustainability leader and Houston Tomorrow employee, Jay Crossley is highly involved in efforts all over Houston, including the creation of safe streets for all users and all types of transportation, promoting the growth of a sustainable local food system, and founding Houston’s first nonprofit co-op. There has been a recent bustle in Houston concerning the distribution and use of our transit taxes, as some of our transit taxes are being diverted from transit efforts and being used by the city for other projects instead– a complex legislative issue in which Crossley is extremely involved. We had the opportunity to talk to Crossley about his involvement with Houston Tomorrow, as well as the current transit tax issue. He broke down the matter so that we can better understand what it’s about, why it’s important, and how we can get involved in the policy vote in November.

FPH: So, you work for Houston Tomorrow- an institute for research, education, and discussion focused on efforts for bettering our city. What projects have you worked on, or are currently working on?

JC: I am very involved with the Houston Coalition for Complete Streets, working to make all streets safe in Houston for all users – pedestrians, bicyclists, the disabled, automobile drivers, freight operators, transit, and local businesses along the street.  We are hoping to see action this year from the City of Houston to lead the region in rethinking how we build our City, block by block. People can sign the petition and get involved at: http://houstoncompletestreets.org/

We have been hosting the Houston Food Policy Workgroup for several years. The mission is to nurture the growth of a sustainable local food system accessible to all, through education, collaboration, communication, and creation of a food policy council for the Houston region. Like us on Facebook to find out about meetings and get involved in building a tighter, healthier food shed for Houston: https://www.facebook.com/HoustonFoodPolicyWorkgroup

I spend a lot of time doing research, examining transportation funding, and trying to figure out how we might be able to better spend money in the region to align transportation to the people’s priorities. Sometimes I work on maps on our GIS (Geographic Information Systems) computer, but we’re always looking for a smart intern ready to speak maps to power; I just don’t have time and there is so much hardcore activism to do in GIS in Houston.

The mission of Houston Tomorrow is to improve the quality of life for all people of the Houston region. We do a lot of different things, but mostly try to empower citizens with better information and provide forums for civic discussion that actually lead to positive change.  Get involved, come to events, sign up for our email newsletter, and find out what real progress looks like in Houston at: http://www.houstontomorrow.org

FPH: One of the main issues you have recently been involved with is the current transit tax issue. The program that is now in effect was approved by voters back in 2003. What are the details of that program?

JC: The Houston region has a 1% transit sales tax that is only used in a portion of the region that agreed to do this over 30 years ago– including most of Harris County, all of the City of Houston, and 14 other cities. The State of Texas allows a 1% transit sales tax. Dallas uses its full 1% for transit. San Antonio only has a .5% transit sales tax, and Austin has a system that is weird, like ours, with some of the money being diverted from transit. When the system was set up and there were actively anti-transit politicians in our region, the agreement was made to divert a fourth of our 1% transit sales tax to roads.

Over time, this program has cost the Houston region at least $2.7 billion in transit funding. You could already be riding the light rail between the Galleria, Astrodome, UH, UHD, St. Thomas, Rice, TSU, Warehouse Live, Notsuoh, all the downtown stadiums, and various neighborhoods, including many with affordable housing options. You could already take a HOV bus from Park & Rides across the region to various job centers– not just downtown– and perhaps in between those centers, and to places like the airports. Also, you’d have a lot more high quality local bus routes, like the 81/82 Westheimer, where you don’t even need to look at the time chart– you just walk to the stop and a bus should be there within seven minutes.

This diversion of our transit taxes means you do not have this high quality transit service today. The continued diversion of it means that Houston cannot begin working on any new services– beyond the three light rail lines and the HOV Park & Rides currently under construction– until 2025.

That is ridiculously stupid.

FPH: If our transit money isn’t currently going directly to transit, where else is the money going?

JC: This diversion has been used for some transit related things, like repaving roads heavily used by buses. However, it also has been used to fund studies on The Great Boondoggle, the Grand “Porkway” and to repave tiny cul-de-sacs in well-to-do neighborhoods. At this point, all of the government entities in the area where we the people are paying our sales taxes for transit have gotten very used to this slush fund.

A representative from West University came to the public hearings that were held to decide what to do with these taxes, and stated that they would be in a very difficult position if the General Mobility Program (GMP)– as the diversion is called– ended in 2014, as it will by law if the voters do not continue it.  You see, many of these entities have actually gone heavily into debt repaving their roads, counting on this diversion to continue.  West U isn’t the only entity assuming we won’t spend this funding on transit. The Renew Houston program was designed to include the entire allocation of the City of Houston’s GMP, somewhere around $100 million a year.

FPH: Any updates on the current vote for a new policy?

JC: The Metro Board of Directors –under a barrage of pro-transit emails, letters, and organizations, as well as threats from super-rich sprawl developers and those opposed to transit funding– decided to send an up or down vote to the people in November.

Voting YES would mean the GMP would continue diverting 25% of your transit sales taxes– but it would fix the problem that the taxes have not been evenly distributed, with some wealthy small cities having received way more than 25% of the sales taxes collected in their jurisdiction.

Voting NO would mean that once passed, 100% of your transit sales taxes would be used for transit.

Apart from his involvement in Houston Tomorrow and other efforts to propel Houston into a positive direction, Crossley lives on a farm and plays in two different bands– he is a pretty cool dude.

  • Jay Crossley

    If yes vote wins, we are stuck with a terrible deal for transit for over a decade into our future.

    If no wins, then the region can plan a better transit future. I’m not so sure the Texas legislature is anti-transit now. I’m not so sure that the people of Houston can’t vote for things and expect to get them. I’m not so sure that it isn’t time for the people of Houston to reject the good old boy system. It is no longer 1983.

    I understand the threat that developer Walt Mischer made at the Metro meetings – that he would pay hundreds of thousands of dollars to lobbyists to convince the legislature to mess up Metro and try to take power away from the City of Houston.

    But I think it’s wrong to threaten the people of Houston. And I’m going to fight it. And I’m going to fight for transit. That old crony world is slowly ending. Let’s go ahead and end it this year.

  • 77027

    Seems like an up and down issue. But what about local politicos sending the matter to the 83rd lege if a NO vote wins at the ballot? This is a widely feared outcome that has given multiple prominent pro-transit activists pause.

  • 77027

    Unfortunately, article does not finish the story. If the GMP gets voted down, which is what a NO vote would do, the anti-transit types will more than likely kick it up to their even more anti-transit buddies in the 83rd Lege–to do with as our dear Elected Officials (I’m looking at you Dennis Bonnen) please. Once it hits Austin, no amount of “hardcore activism”, even that which is graciously done on the part of our saviors the Crossleys, will salvage what is left of METRO’s meager funding.
    Think realpolitik. Think about the next 10 years. Transit advocates learned important lessons this time around (I’m looking at you Christof Spieler) and the swords will be sharper. Sure it will cost the system quality and expansion (which in turn feeds the “tear it all down” types) but don’t close your eyes to the strides taken this year: an adjustment of diversion rates to be more fair, a cap on the diversion rates, and a public conversation about what we want in terms of a transit system. This kind of publicity cost METRO a fortune when they were doing public outreach for the long-range plan last summer. With GMP, they got it and more for free.